Understanding Rolling Without Slipping

Click For Summary
In rolling without slipping on a rough, flat surface, friction provides the necessary torque to prevent slipping, but once the no-slip condition is achieved, static friction becomes zero, eliminating net torque. On a horizontal surface, no friction is needed to maintain this condition, while on a sloped surface, friction is essential as the object accelerates, requiring an increase in rotational speed. The discussion clarifies that static friction only acts when there is a risk of slipping; once the object rolls at the correct speed, friction is not required. The key distinction lies in the object's acceleration: friction is necessary on slopes to maintain rolling without slipping, but not on flat surfaces. Understanding these dynamics helps explain why radial acceleration ceases under specific conditions.
Conservation
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
For conditions where an object is rolling without slipping on a rough, flat surface, the object posses a net torque about the center of mass provided by friction at the contact point. Hence, why doesn't the object accelerate radially indefinitely?

For ex, if we had a slippery bowling ball rolling down a rough, flat surface, its radial acceleration would increase until its translational velocity=W*R (no-slip condition met) and then continue to do so. Why does the radial acceleration no longer occur despite the presence of a net torque?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation said:
For conditions where an object is rolling without slipping on a rough, flat surface, the object posses a net torque about the center of mass provided by friction at the contact point. Hence, why doesn't the object accelerate radially indefinitely?
If the surface is horizontal, there would be no static friction and thus no torque. (Ignoring details like rolling resistance.) If it's rolling downhill, then it would keep accelerating.

Conservation said:
For ex, if we had a slippery bowling ball rolling down a rough, flat surface, its radial acceleration would increase until its translational velocity=W*R (no-slip condition met) and then continue to do so. Why does the radial acceleration no longer occur despite the presence of a net torque?
Once the "rolling without slipping" condition is met, there is no longer friction acting and no net torque. At least for a horizontal surface.
 
Why is there friction for a sloped surface and no friction for a flat surface?
 
Conservation said:
Why is there friction for a sloped surface and no friction for a flat surface?
Friction acts to prevent slipping between surfaces. For a horizontal surface, friction is not need to prevent slipping. Friction is needed for a sloped surface.
 
I'm sorry, but I don't follow. It's definitely possible to have an object slip or slip/roll on a horizontal surface, and friction is present for those cases...
 
Conservation said:
I'm sorry, but I don't follow. It's definitely possible to have an object slip or slip/roll on a horizontal surface, and friction is present for those cases...
Only if it's accelerating. Once it meets the no-slip condition, you can change the surface to one that is perfectly frictionless and you won't know the difference. Friction is only needed to change the speed (rotational and translational).
 
So friction exists before no-slip condition and then becomes 0 once it reaches no-slip? That makes sense logically and satisfies the lack of net torque in rolling without slipping, but I don't see how this is physically possible.
 
Conservation said:
So friction exists before no-slip condition and then becomes 0 once it reaches no-slip?
Right.

Conservation said:
That makes sense logically and satisfies the lack of net torque in rolling without slipping, but I don't see how this is physically possible.
Imagine the surface suddenly became frictionless as the object rolled along. What would be the relative speed of the bottom surface of the object and the frictionless surface? Would there be slipping? (Remember, we are talking about static friction here.)
 
Relative speed would be 0, which makes the friction static. But shouldn't the static friction still have some form of direction, providing net torque?
 
  • #10
Conservation said:
Relative speed would be 0, which makes the friction static.
Since (without friction) there is no slipping (as you said, the relative speed is zero), friction is not needed to prevent it. Only if there would be slipping without the friction, would you need friction.

Conservation said:
But shouldn't the static friction still have some form of direction, providing net torque?
The static friction is zero, since it's moving at just the right speed so there is no slipping to prevent.
 
  • #11
Okay, I think I understand now for the scenario of the flat surface. Thank you.
What about sloped surface, though? Why would rolling without slipping on a sloped surface have friction?
 
  • #12
Conservation said:
Okay, I think I understand now for the scenario of the flat surface. Thank you.
Cool.

Conservation said:
What about sloped surface, though? Why would rolling without slipping on a sloped surface have friction?
Since the object is speeding up, the rotational speed must increase accordingly to maintain no slipping. That requires friction exerting a torque.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K