Understanding Special Relativity: Solving for Proper Distance and Lifetime

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem related to special relativity involving an unstable high-energy particle moving at 0.978c. The proper distance traveled by the particle, calculated using the Lorentz factor (gamma), is determined to be 0.00662 m. It is clarified that the distance measured in the laboratory frame is the proper distance, while the distance perceived by someone traveling with the particle is shorter due to length contraction. The participants emphasize that lengths contract for moving objects, confirming that the particle's frame measures a shorter distance compared to the lab frame. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving parts of the problem regarding proper lifetime and dilated lifetime.
jdub99
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An unstable high-energy particle is created in the laboratory, and it moves at a speed of 0.978c. Relative to a stationary reference frame fixed to the laboratory, the particle travels a distance of 1.38x10-3 m before disintegrating.

(a) What is the proper distance traveled?
(b) What is the distance measured by a hypothetical person traveling with the particle?
(c) What is the proper lifetime?
(d) What is the dilated lifetime?

Homework Equations



L0/(gamma)=L

(gamma)=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Stuck on part A:
V=.978c
L= 1.38x10-3m
L0=?

(gamma)=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)2)= 1/sqrt(1-(.978)2)= 4.79


L0=L x (gamma)= (1.38x10-3m)(4.79)= .00662m

Did something wrong and cannot figure it out. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdub99 said:
L0=L x (gamma)= (1.38x10-3m)(4.79)= .00662m

Did something wrong and cannot figure it out. Please help!
According to the particle frame, is the distance traveled shorter or longer than seen in the lab frame?
 
Distance should be greater for L0 because (gamma) is going to always be greater than 1. Right? It should be shorter in the lab frame compared to particle frame.
 
Last edited:
jdub99 said:
Distance should be greater for L0 because (gamma) is going to always be greater than 1. Right? It should be shorter in the lab frame compared to particle frame.
Realize that the distance is measured at rest in the lab frame, so I suppose that's the distance they want as the "proper distance". From the view of the particle frame, that distance is moving. What happens to moving lengths? (That's really part b, not part a. Oops!)
 
Lengths contract when moving. so the particle should be the shorter distance. So part a is the given part of the question. Ok parts a and b make
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top