Understanding Summation and Latex: A Simple Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
I feel so silly asking this question, but is (the summation is over n1 from 1 to infinity. I have no idea how to type it with the latex)

\sum(x1^n1)/n1!*(x^(n-n1))/(n-n1)!

= lim(_{n1 \rightarrow \infty}) (1 + x/n1)^n1 * lim(_{n1 \rightarrow \infty}) (1 + x/(n-n1))^(n-n1)

= exp(x1)*exp(x2)

?

I know it's simple, but I'm just not sure what the rules are for products inside sums. And also, how the heck do you learn the whole latex thing? I can't for the life of me it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\sum \frac{(x1^n^1)}{n1!} \ast \frac{(x^(^n^-^n^1^))}{(n-n1)!}

is this correct so far?
 
quasar_4 said:
I feel so silly asking this question, but is (the summation is over n1 from 1 to infinity. I have no idea how to type it with the latex)

\sum(x1^n1)/n1!*(x^(n-n1))/(n-n1)!

= lim(_{n1 \rightarrow \infty}) (1 + x/n1)^n1 * lim(_{n1 \rightarrow \infty}) (1 + x/(n-n1))^(n-n1)

= exp(x1)*exp(x2)
?

I know it's simple, but I'm just not sure what the rules are for products inside sums. And also, how the heck do you learn the whole latex thing? I can't for the life of me it out.
Please start by telling us what the problem really is! In your first sum you have "x1" and "x". In second line, only "x" and then in the third line "x1" and "x2".
 
oh yes, it does seem that I missed some details (it was late at night :smile:).

The summation is over n1, from 0 to infinity, and there is an x1 and x2 (they're just constants). So it's just what offtheleft has written, except I forgot to put x2 instead of x on the second term At first I thought that this would just turn into two exponentials, because each of the pieces resemble exponentials, but I'm not so sure now. I don't know much about how sums fit into algebra (having only seen them for the most part in calculus and linear algebra, but never for the sake of learning their properties).

Is it ever the general case that the sum (x*y) = sum(x)*sum(y)? I guess I can answer my own question with a counterexample...

so in that case, how do I simplify my sum? In the end I think the correct answer is supposed to be an (x1+x2).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top