Understanding Tangent Vectors in GR Notation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Irid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Notation
Irid
Messages
207
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to learn some GR from Carrol's textbook, but I'm a little lost there. For example, this simple problem:

In Euclidean 3-space, let p be the point with coordinates (x,y,z) = (1,0,-1). Consider the curve passing through p:

x^i(\lambda) = (\lambda, (\lambda-1)^2, -\lambda)

Calculate the components of tangent vectors to these curves at p in the coordinate basis \{\partial_x, \partial_y, \partial_z\}.

The attempt at a solution

The components of tangent vectors are given by

V^i = \frac{dx^i}{d\lambda}

It is of course in the basis of x,y,z. But I don't understand what does the basis \{\partial_x, \partial_y, \partial_z\} mean. The notation is new to me, but I think that

\partial_x \equiv \frac{\partial}{\partial x}

so how can this be used as a basis? If you just take these derivatives at each component of the curve, you always get (1,1,1), right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In GR, and differential geometry in general, you often define a vector as a directional derivative. So the vector ai+bj+ck (where i,j,k are the usual unit vectors) is written as a*d/dx+b*d/dy+c*d/dz. Since the derivative along the direction i is d/dx etc.
 
Alright, so this is a trivial problem then, right?
 
Irid said:
Alright, so this is a trivial problem then, right?

Sure. Just like what you did in Calc I but written in GR type notation.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top