Understanding the Chain Rule in Multivariable Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi,
here is what I'm trying to do:

Find

<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(2x, 3y)<br />

First of all, I'm confused by the

<br /> f(2x, 3y)<br />

How does the function look like? I imagine that it is for example

<br /> f(x,y) = cos(xy) - sin(3xy^2}<br />

and that therefore

<br /> f(2x, 3y) = cos(6xy) - sin(54xy^2)<br />

I'm confused, I don't have any good picture of how it might look in real.
Anyway, to accomplish the task:

<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(2x, 3y) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{d(2x)}{dx} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{d(3y)}{dx} = 2\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}<br />

Is it ok? If yes, could you please give an example of this scenario? I mean, how could f(2x, 3y) and f(x,y), respectively, look like so that I could see it with the particular functions?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x,y) is just a function mapping of your x and y coordinates.

As for the derivative, when you take the derivative with respect to x, the y values are treated as if they were constants, same for x when you derive with respect for y.
 
ComputerGeek said:
f(x,y) is just a function mapping of your x and y coordinates.

As for the derivative, when you take the derivative with respect to x, the y values are treated as if they were constants, same for x when you derive with respect for y.

So, is my approach ok? And how could the functions look like?

Thank you.
 
Just imagine that

v(x)=2x, and w(y)=6y

Then

f(2x,6y)=f(v(x), w(y)) for arbitrary f.


for example
if
f(x)=cos(x)
then f(v)= cos(v)=cos(2x)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top