Understanding the Components of Energy in Fluid Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Emec is defined as the mechanical energy per unit mass, represented by the equation Emec = P/ρ + v²/2 + gz, where P is pressure, ρ is density, v is velocity, and g is gravitational acceleration. The resulting units of m²/s² indicate energy per unit mass, which is consistent with the concept of specific energy. The confusion arises from the expectation that energy should be measured in Joules, but in this context, Emec is specifically a measure of energy per unit mass. The equation effectively divides each term by mass, leading to the interpretation of Emec as energy per unit mass rather than total energy. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between pressure, velocity, and gravitational potential energy in fluid mechanics.
custer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Why does Emec= P/\rho + v^2/2 + gz ?
The units resulting from the three expressions are m^2/s^2
but unit for energy is supposed to be Joules? where does the mass go? If the three expressions were already divided by the mass then why Emec still remains as Emec?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi custer! :smile:

(have a rho: ρ :wink:)
custer said:
Why does Emec= P/\rho + v^2/2 + gz ?

Which book did you get that equation from? :confused:

The LHS should be the mechanical energy per unit mass.

(Compare it with ε, the internal energy per unit mass, or "specific internal energy").

See the PF Library on pressure and Bernoulli's equation :wink:
 
got it from a slide in my lecture note.. no wonder ;P
thank you :)
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top