Understanding the Composition Rule and Transformation Law in Weinberg's QFT

  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmic dust
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Qft
cosmic dust
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Hello, a confusion has arose during my so far study of the above book.

According to the composition rule (2.3.11) it should be: U\left( \Lambda ,a \right)=U\left( \mathbf{1},a \right)U\left( \Lambda \right) and according to transformation law (2.5.3) and the eigenvalue equation which follows (2.5.1), it should be:

U\left( \Lambda ,a \right){{\Psi }_{p,\sigma }}={{e}^{-i\left( \Lambda p \right)\cdot a}}\sum\limits_{{{\sigma }'}}{{{C}_{{\sigma }'\sigma }}\left( \Lambda ,p \right){{\Psi }_{\Lambda p,{\sigma}' }}}​

Right? If yes, then my question is: how are the above compatible with eq. (3.1.1), since the phase factor that appears in the beginning of the RHS of this equation, contains the untrasformed four-momentums of the particles? Shouldn’t the phase of this factor be the following:

-i{{a}_{\mu }}\left[ {{\left( \Lambda {{p}_{1}} \right)}^{\mu }}+{{\left( \Lambda {{p}_{2}} \right)}^{\mu }}+... \right]
?

Thank' s in advance for your replies
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't that what it is? That's what it says in my book. Maybe there was a misprint that got corrected.
 
Then obviously my print has some mistakes. Thank’ s a lot Bill_K , now I can continue my study…
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top