Understanding the Effects of Entanglement in Radioactive Decay

In summary: This means that in order to observe any effects on the daughter nucleus, one would need to measure the other half of the entangled pair and repeat the process multiple times to see a significant correlation. In summary, measuring the alpha particle in this scenario only results in the collapse of the wave function and does not have any direct effect on the daughter nucleus.
  • #1
Trollfaz
137
14
Lets say a radioactive atom decayed into an alpha particle and a daughter nucleus. The two particles are entangled. If you measure, the alpha particle, you will collapse the wavefunction of the daughter nucleus. Other than collapsing wavefunction, does have any effect on the daughter nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In short, nope.

In slightly longer form:
The only other interaction besides collapsing wavefunction would be due to electromagnetic radiation emanating from the alpha particle and measurement device due to whatever interaction was involved in measurement. This radiation (if any) rapidly decreases intensity with distance, as it propagates at the speed of light. Once that radiation finally reaches the daughter nucleus, the probability if an appreciable change in the quantum state (say, by absorbing a photon) is negligibly low.

Guessing from the thread title, I can say in a nutshell, that (our current models show) there is no way of telling by measuring a single particle if it happens to be half of an entangled pair. You would have to measure the other half of the pair to see the entanglement, which throws a wrench into FTL communication via entanglement.
 
  • #3
Trollfaz said:
If you measure, the alpha particle, you will collapse the wavefunction of the daughter nucleus.
You will collapse the wave function of the entire quantum system which includes the alpha particle and the daughter nucleus. That's a very different thing.
 
  • #4
jfizzix said:
You would have to measure the other half of the pair to see the entanglement,
And even that's not good enough... You would have to repeat this measurements multiple times on multiple pairs, and find a stronger correlation than just random chance is likely to produce.
 

Related to Understanding the Effects of Entanglement in Radioactive Decay

1. What is entanglement in radioactive decay?

Entanglement in radioactive decay is a phenomenon in which two or more particles become correlated with each other, affecting their individual decay processes. This means that the decay of one particle can influence the decay of another, even when they are physically separated.

2. How does entanglement affect the rate of radioactive decay?

Entanglement can either increase or decrease the rate of radioactive decay, depending on the specific circumstances. In some cases, it can cause particles to decay faster due to the correlated nature of their decay processes. However, in other cases, it can also inhibit decay by preventing particles from interacting with their surroundings.

3. What are the potential applications of understanding entanglement in radioactive decay?

Understanding entanglement in radioactive decay can have various practical applications, such as improving the accuracy of radiometric dating techniques, developing more precise nuclear clocks, and enhancing the efficiency of nuclear power plants.

4. Can entanglement in radioactive decay be observed in real life?

Yes, entanglement in radioactive decay has been observed in numerous experiments, including those involving the decay of radioactive isotopes and nuclear reactions. It is a well-established phenomenon in the field of quantum mechanics.

5. How does entanglement in radioactive decay relate to quantum mechanics?

Entanglement in radioactive decay is a consequence of the principles of quantum mechanics, which describe the behavior of particles at the subatomic level. It is a manifestation of the entanglement of quantum states, in which particles can become intertwined and affect each other's properties even when separated by vast distances.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
434
Replies
4
Views
641
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
27
Views
819
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
648
Replies
1
Views
831
Replies
8
Views
756
Replies
1
Views
648
Back
Top