Understanding the Equalizing Nature of Negative Feedback in Op Amps

  • Thread starter Thread starter sidvelu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Op amp
AI Thread Summary
Negative feedback in operational amplifiers (op amps) ensures that the output adjusts to equalize the positive and negative inputs. If the negative input is lower than the positive, the output increases, raising the negative input voltage closer to the positive input. Conversely, if the negative input is higher, the output decreases, driving the negative input down. This equalization principle applies to both inverting and non-inverting configurations, as the feedback mechanism is central to their operation. Understanding this concept clarifies how op amps maintain stability in various applications.
sidvelu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I understand how to apply op amps, but one thing about op amps had bugged me for some time. I want to know what about an op amp in negative feedback forces both the posotive and negative inputs to be equal. And could your explanation be for both an inverting and non inverting op amp.

Thanks! :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sidvelu said:
I understand how to apply op amps, but one thing about op amps had bugged me for some time. I want to know what about an op amp in negative feedback forces both the posotive and negative inputs to be equal.

Welcome back to PF.

If the (-) input were significantly lower than the (+) input, that would drive the output high, since V_{out}=A\cdot(V_+-V_-). And because of the feed back to the (-) input, driving the output high would raise the voltage at (-) input, driving it closer to the voltage at the (+) input.

A similar argument applies to considering if the (-) input were significantly higher then the (+) input.

And could your explanation be for both an inverting and non inverting op amp.
Not sure what you mean here. Op amps are not "inverting" or "non inverting", those terms refer to the two inputs of any op amp. The explanation only works for feedback to the inverting input, that I refer to as (-) above.
 
Last edited:
oh okay, that makes more sense now. I should've drawn that conclusion on my own, but i guess i was just being stupid.

Thanks alot!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top