Understanding the Flow Control Principle of Valves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the flow control principle of valves, specifically globe valves, and the relationship between pressure, velocity, and friction losses. Participants clarify that while Bernoulli's principle suggests energy conservation, real-world applications reveal that energy is lost through friction and turbulence, leading to a decrease in mean velocity for a given pressure drop. The conversation emphasizes that the valve's function is to regulate flow by increasing friction and turbulence, complicating flow modeling. Empirical data from valve vendors, such as Cv vs. position curves, are essential for accurate modeling of flow through valves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's principle
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics and flow characteristics
  • Familiarity with valve types, particularly globe valves
  • Experience with empirical data analysis in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of friction losses in fluid flow through valves
  • Study the empirical methods for modeling valve performance
  • Explore the relationship between turbulence and pressure drop in fluid systems
  • Learn about Cv (flow coefficient) and its application in valve selection
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics specialists, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of valve systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing flow control in piping systems.

fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
How exactly would you describe the principle of a valve for flow control?

In a globe valve for example the fluid flows through valve seat and generally leaves the valve with the outlet diameter being the same as the inlet diameter.

My original assumptions were that Bernoulli's principle had to be somehow related but if you ignore friction losses etc. then surely the energy is conserved and the dynamic pressure at the outlet would equal the inlet dynamic pressure due to the diameters being the same. In this case there would be no change in velocity or static pressure.

Energy must be lost somehow for the volumetric flow to change but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some more thoughts...

An decrease in flow area would cause a static pressure drop which would, again assuming no friction losses, have the effect of increasing flow velocity. This I can understand would happen through the inlet and seat of the valve however fundamentally as the fluid leaves the valve the opposite should occur and the velocity should return to its original value.

By this logic there should be no net static or dynamic pressure change across the valve.
 
In reality the valve restricts the cross-section of the flow, thus increasing the power of friction resisting the flow and also supporting the development of turbulent flow. As a result of these processes, for a given pressure drop the mean velocity of water gets lower.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In response to Jano L.

So what you are saying is that energy is lost through friction as heat? I guess this would make modelling the flow through a valve fairly difficult.


I also refer to the image below, theoretically assuming no losses in the pipe to friction and incompressibility etc. if we could somehow control the area of A2 this would have no effect on the net volumetric flow through this section? Therefore the concept of a valve solely relies on the increase in friction?

bernoul.gif
 
Friction and also turbulence. The valve may increase the whirling motion of the water which also leads to decrease of pressure, and the friction then leads to loss of even this whirling motion into heat. The picture you posted is very simplified picture of what happens to water. In practice the flow is usually not so simple.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
fonz said:
... I guess this would make modelling the flow through a valve fairly difficult.

yes. In practice it is done empirically. The result is a curve provided by the valve vendor, Cv vs. position, that allows you to include a head loss term on the RHS of your Bernoulli equation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K