B Understanding the GUT Scale: Merging Fundamental Forces at High Energies

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter nolxiii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gut Scale
nolxiii
Messages
40
Reaction score
5
So I've heard it talked about how how at high energies all the strength of all fundamental forces are expected to merge together to single force, but don't quite get how you get from "all the forces have the same strength at high energies" to "all the forces are really the same force."

Couldn't they have the same strength but still act differently? And if they acted the same at high energies wouldn't their behavior at low energies still differentiate them into separate phenomenon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nolxiii said:
So I've heard it talked about how how at high energies all the strength of all fundamental forces are expected to merge together to single force, but don't quite get how you get from "all the forces have the same strength at high energies" to "all the forces are really the same force."

You are right, it does not follow. It's just a "maybe", a hint from the data that maybe it's one force.

And if they acted the same at high energies wouldn't their behavior at low energies still differentiate them into separate phenomenon?

We have an example. Electroweak SU(2) force is one force, but at low energies it "breaks" into two seemingly completely different things: W+- bosons are quite different from that part of SU(2) which is part of photons.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Right on. Still struggling somewhat to build a mental model of how the electroweak symmetry breaking works, the link below I think helped a bit though. Am I understanding this right that if the symmetry just happened to break in such a way that W bosons were (nearly?) massless that the weak and electromagnetic forces would still behave more or less identically?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/unify.html
 
An unbroken SU(2) force would not be identical to electromagnetism.
An unbroken U(1) force is identical to electromagnetism.
 
nikkkom said:
An unbroken SU(2) force would not be identical to electromagnetism.
An unbroken U(1) force is identical to electromagnetism.

what would this unbroken SU(2) force look like?
 
It would be a long-range force, IIRC attractive for any SU(2) charges (unlike electricity, where like charges repel).
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top