Understanding the Hall Effect: Comparing Germanium and Copper Magnetometers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casey_Switzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
The Hall effect, discovered by E. H. Hall in 1979, describes how a potential difference (Hall voltage) appears across a conductor when a current flows perpendicular to a magnetic field. This voltage can be expressed as V = vBl, where v is the charge carrier's velocity, B is the magnetic field strength, and l is the width of the conductor. In magnetometers, the difference between using copper (with negative charge carriers) and germanium (with positive "holes") affects the direction of charge movement and the resulting Hall voltage. Electrons in copper will migrate in one direction under a magnetic field, while holes in germanium will move in the opposite direction, leading to different charge distributions. Understanding these differences is crucial for applications in magnetometry.
Casey_Switzer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I'm a little stumped on this one, maybe someone can help.

I don't need someone to do it for me, just maybe start me in the right direction.

The American physicist E. H. Hall discovered (1979) that when a current travels along a conducting plate of width l, which is perpendcular to a magnetic field, a potential difference V appears across the plate. Prove that V = vBl

Also,

The Hall probe makes a very convenient magnetometer. Discuss the difference you might expect if the probe is made of copper in one case, where the charge carriers are negative, and germanium, where the charge carriers are positive "holes." The Hall effect reveals a difference between positive charge moving to the right and negative charge moving to the left. Explain.

Thanks for any advice you can give.

Casey
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know, I assume, that if a point particle carrying a charge q moves with velocity v through a magnetic field B and the direction of v is perpendicular to the direction of B, the particle experiences a force

FB = qvB

in a direction perpendicular to both v and B.

Assume for the moment that the current consists of electrons flowing through the conductor.

So, imagine a conducting plate lying flat on your desk, with a current of (negative) electrons flowing through it from right to left. And imagine that there is a magnetic field directed vertically down (i.e. towards the floor) through it.

Each of the electrons is moving perpendicular to the magnetic field, & therefore experiences a force perpendicular to its direction of flow and perpendicular to the magnetic field, in the plane of the plate, away from you towards the far edge of the plate (right-hand rule applies - remember the electrons are negative). As a result, negative charges will tend to migrate away from you towards that far edge, and therefore, there will be a negative charge at that edge, and an offsetting positive charge at the edge near you (due to the "loss" of the electrons that went away).

Now you have positive charge and negative charge at opposite edges of the plate, which of course attract each other with a force that depends on the size of the charge and the distance separating them. Assume the distance is equal to the width of the plate & you can compute the magnitude of that force, and you can compute the corresponding voltage difference (the "Hall voltage") across the plate.

Equilibrium occurs when the force on the charges due to the Hall voltage is equal to the force on them due to the magnetic field.

Work on that for a while.

:smile:
 
Hey thanks alot! I'll do some more work on this and see how far I get.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top