Understanding the Impact of Pressure on Reaction Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter PPonte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The heat of reaction refers to the heat absorbed or released when compounds react at constant pressure, reflecting the change in enthalpy. Increasing pressure requires work on the system, which raises energy, while decreasing pressure allows the system to do work, affecting energy levels. The average kinetic energy of particles in a system is linked to temperature, with the equation E_k = (3/2)kT illustrating this relationship. The ideal gas law connects pressure, volume, and temperature, emphasizing the interplay between these variables. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping how pressure influences reaction energy.
PPonte
The heat of reaction is:

The amount of heat absorbed or evolved when specified amounts of compounds react under constant pressure.
The change in the enthalpy of the system that occurs when a reaction is run at constant pressure.

My question is: what does the change in pressure do to the energy involved in a reaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To increase the pressure you have to do work on the system, thereby increasing the energy. To decrease the pressure (aslong as it is above 1 atm) you have to allow the system to do work. This a bit of a rough and ready explanation I'll admit.
 
Ok. Rough but good.
So, the heat of reaction is the change in the internal energy of the systhem. Right?
 
Temperature is the mean kinetic energy of the particles in that system. The average kinetic energy of a system can said to be
E_k = \frac{3}{2}kT
The ideal gas law links, pressure volume and temperature:
pV = nRT = NkT
n is number of moles; Ris molar gas constant; N is number of molecules/particles; k is the Boltzmann constant = \frac{R}{N_A} where N_A is Avagadro's constant.

For more information on heat see http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/heacon.html#heacon . But be aware that this is heat from a physics perspective and chemistry.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top