Understanding the Invariance of Hamming Distance: A Shift Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter florenti
  • Start date Start date
florenti
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Please help me ...

to show that the Hamming disatance d(x,y) is invariant to a shift of both x and y i.e

d(x+z, y+z)=d(x,y)

Thanks a lot

flo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
florenti said:
Please help me ...

to show that the Hamming disatance d(x,y) is invariant to a shift of both x and y i.e

d(x+z, y+z)=d(x,y)

Thanks a lot

flo

Another poster, Lenti, asked this same question a couple of days ago.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top