Understanding the Larmor Formula: The Role of Field Line Connections

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the Larmor formula and the reasoning behind the connection of parallel field lines in a specific diagram. The user questions how equal flux in cones around the x-axis implies that two field lines, AB and CD, are connected. They seek clarification on this reasoning, as they find the explanation insufficient. Additionally, the user mentions technical difficulties accessing the referenced PDF document. The inquiry highlights a need for a clearer understanding of field line connections in the context of electromagnetic theory.
albega
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to derive this formula, and I'm basing it upon the following method (this has the diagram which I will be talking about below)
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1214926.files/Purcell-appendix-B.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm fine with everything apart from the reasoning that the parallel field lines (from where q is, and where it would be) have to join up in the middle region. The reasoning for this is given as

'A field line such as AB lies on a cone around the x-axis which includes a certain amount of flux from the charge q. If CD makes the same angle θ with the axis, the cone on which it lies includes the same amount of flux. Hence AB and CD must be parts of the same field line, connected by a segment BC.'

I don't see how the cones having equal flux implies the two field lines must be the same and so joined. Could anybody explain this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone please? It won't take too long to read the derivation!
 
I've tried a couple of times to view the PDF, but it comes up blank on my system. Maybe others have the same problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top