Understanding the Last Step of a Proof for a One-to-One Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter chickensagan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the algebraic manipulation involved in the last step of a proof concerning a one-to-one function. Participants are examining the factorization process and the handling of expressions involving variables x1 and x2.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the algebraic steps in the proof, specifically questioning the disappearance of a term during factorization. Some participants suggest alternative representations of the variables to simplify the expression, while others express confusion about the factorization process and the presence of the -2 term.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the algebraic concepts, with some providing insights into factorization techniques. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the clarity of the steps involved, as questions about the factorization process and the handling of terms persist.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the depth of exploration into the underlying concepts. The discussion reflects varying levels of comfort with algebraic manipulation.

chickensagan
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Please may someone explain the last step of this proof for me? I can't see how it's done algebraically. Where does the second (x1-x2) go? Is it a mistake?

maths.png


I've tried multiplying out -2 and everything else I could think of but to no avail.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi chickensagan.
There is no error, this is just factorization.
maybe you are being intimidated by the (x2-x1) expression, just call it 'a'. and call 'x1+x2' 'b'
so in the last step you have a.b - 2.a = a(b-2)
Not sure if I really addressed your problem.

Cheers...
 
Thanks for the reply Oli4, but I still don't get it.
I don't understand how they factorise it when both sides don't have 2 as a common factor, and even if that happened how does the -2 end up inside the bracket?
 
what is being factorized is the term (x2-x1) or the term 'a' in my simplified version.
a*b+a*2=a*(b+2) <- is this problematic for you ? just check it by doing the expansion.
in this case it is a*b-a*2=a*(b-2)
with a being x2-x1 and b being x2+x1
 
Perhaps more simply:$$(x_1 - x_2)(x_1 + x_2) - 2(x_1 - x_2) = (x_1 - x_2)[(x_1 + x_2) - 2].$$Using the [,] might make you see it easier - I just used a common factor of ##(x_1 - x_2)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K