Understanding the Lorentz Transformation: Unpacking the Mathematical Steps

dperez3894
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I don't know which math forum to put this in but perhaps someone here could help out.

I want to figure out the mathematics behind the Lorentz Transformation so I can understand it better. I've got a copy of Einstein's Relativity which was reprinted by Three Rivers Press a few years ago.

In the Appendix there's a section on the Lorentz Transformation and I've hit a wall in figuring out the steps between the equations.

On page 133 they have the following equation sets;

(5)
x' = ax - bct
ct' = act - bx

(6)

v = bc/a

On page 134 it gave an example where if a snapshot was taken from K'(t'=0) and t was removed from equations (5) where;

x' = ax - bc
0 = ac - bx

and taking into account expression (6), the following equation was derived;

x' = a(1-(v^2/c^2))x

Where did the (1-(v^2/c^2)) come from?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll attempt a purely mathematical explanation, I don't know **** about relativity ;)

Factor out the a and the x, and use the fact that bc/a = v.

x' = ax - bc = a(x - \frac{bc}{a}) = a(x - v) = ax(1 - \frac{v}{x}).

But 0 = ac - bx was given, so bx = ac, so x = \frac{ac}{b}. Substituting into the previous equation yields

x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{ac/b}) = ax(1 - \frac{bv}{ac}) = ax(1 - \frac{b}{a} \cdot \frac{v}{c}).

But v = bc/a (given), so \frac{b}{a} = \frac{v}{c}. Thus

x' = ax(1 - \frac{v}{c} \cdot \frac{v}{c}) = ax(1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}).
 
Last edited:
Here's a derivation that has nothing to do with relativity:

A man is swimming in a river. The man can swim at "c" m/s in still water and the river is flowing at "v" m/s.

First the man swims a distance d downstream and then back up again. Of course, down stream his speed, relative to the shore, is v+c so it takes him time t<sub>1</sub>= d/(v+c) rto do that. Swimming back up stream his speed, still relative to the shore, is c- v so it takes him t<sub>2</sub> = d/(c-v) to do that:total time downstream and back, d/(c+v)+ d/(c-v)= (d(c-v)+ d(c+v))/((c-v)(c+v))= 2dc(c<sup>2</sup>- v<sup>2</sup>).

Now, he swims across the river a distance d' and back again. Drawing a vector diagram, it should be clear that he has to angle upstream slightly so that there is a right triangle with length ct (what he would swim if there were no current), vertical leg vt (how the current pushes him downstream), and horiontal leg (across the river) d'. That is: c<sup>2<sup>t<sup>2</sup>= v<sup>2</sup>+ d'<sup>2</sup>. Solving for t, t<sup>2<sup>= d'<sup>2</sup>/(c<sup>2</sup>- v<sup>2</sup>) and t= \frac{d&#039;}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}.
That's one way: doing exactly the same thing back, the total time to swim out and back is \frac{2d&#039;}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}.

Now suppose he finds that the two times are the same. What is the relationship between d and d'?

We have t= \frac{2dc}{c^2-v^2}= \frac{2d&#039;}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}

That gives
d= \frac{d&#039; \sqrt{c^2- v^2}}{c}
= d&#039; \sqrt{1- (v/c)^2}.

Do you see how that is connected to the Michaelson-Morley experiment?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Muzza said:
I'll attempt a purely mathematical explanation, I don't know **** about relativity ;)

Factor out the a and the x, and use the fact that bc/a = v.

x&#039; = ax - bc = a(x - \frac{bc}{a}) = a(x - v) = ax(1 - \frac{v}{x}).

But 0 = ac - bx was given, so bx = ac, so x = \frac{ac}{b}. Substituting into the previous equation yields

x&#039; = ax(1 - \frac{v}{ac/b}) = ax(1 - \frac{bv}{ac}) = ax(1 - \frac{b}{a} \cdot \frac{v}{c}).

But v = bc/a (given), so \frac{b}{a} = \frac{v}{c}. Thus

x&#039; = ax(1 - \frac{v}{c} \cdot \frac{v}{c}) = ax(1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}).

Thanks. It's been quite a while since I've factored equations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top