Understanding the Moon's Changing Angular Momentum and Its Impact on Eclipses

AI Thread Summary
The angular momentum of the Moon changes over time due to the gravitational influence of the Sun, affecting its orbital dynamics. Eclipses occur when the Moon is full and aligned with the nodes of its orbit, which intersect with the Earth's orbital plane. These nodes shift over time, resulting in an eclipse season approximately every 173.3 days, allowing for multiple eclipses in a single year. Typically, there are at least two eclipse events annually, with the potential for up to five, including partial eclipses. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the relationship between the Moon's angular momentum and the occurrence of eclipses.
Universh13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that the angular momentum of the moon with respect to the Earth can be calculated by L = Iw but if the L of the moon is k * Learth-sun the there will be way more eclipses, one of each every 28 days. So the momentum of the moon must change over time, how does it work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why does it have to change? And what is I and what is w in that formula?
 
How are eclipses related to the angular momentum of the moon?
Universh13 said:
So the momentum of the moon must change over time
No.
The orbital planes moon/earth and moon/sun are not aligned, only twice per year they cross at the right place to give eclipses.
 
  • Like
Likes Universh13
mfb said:
The orbital planes moon/earth and moon/sun are not aligned, only twice per year they cross at the right place to give eclipses.

Ok, now I get it, so there are two points every 28 days that are the same for both planes and 2 per year in which those points are aligned forming eclipses. Thank you
 
Well, the orbital planes cross all the time.
The moon will go through the intersection points of the two orbits twice per month but to have a total eclipse the moon has to be full too. So it happens not so often.
It happens twice a year for many years but not as a rule. There will be only one (total) in 2019 and none in 2020. There will be some sort of events, though. Like partial or penumbral eclipses.
 
  • Like
Likes Universh13
Universh13 said:
Ok, now I get it, so there are two points every 28 days that are the same for both planes and 2 per year in which those points are aligned forming eclipses. Thank you

In any given calendar year there will be at least 2 eclipse events (including partial eclipses) and as many as 5.

Eclipses happen during full moons, which are 29.53 days apart, and when the Moon is within 18 degrees of a node( the point where the the orbital planes cross). Now if the planes of the two orbits kept the same orientation, then the Moon would cross a node every 13.66 days ( 1/2 of 27.32 days, which is the sidereal month or the time it takes the Moon to complete one orbit with respect to the stars). But they Don't. Due to the effect of the Sun's gravity on the Moon, the Moon's orbit precesses, and "wobbles" with respect to the Earth's orbital plane. As a result, the nodes slowly shift and the time it takes for the Moon to travel from one node and back to it again (the Draconic month) is 27.21 days.

The end result is that every 173.3 days we enter an eclipse season, where the we have a new moon and the Moon is within 18 degree of an node. What this means is if you have a partial eclipse at the start of an eclipse season, the next new moon can occur before the end of the eclipse season and you can have partial eclipses in consecutive months.
In addition, 173.3 days is ~9 days less than 1/2 a year. This means that it if a calendar year starts with an eclipse season, the next eclipse season will start ~9 days before the midpoint of the year, and you will start a third eclipse season ~18 days before the end of the year. So, it is possible to have two partial eclipses each in the first two eclipse seasons, and have a fifth eclipse occur during the first part of the third eclipse season resulting in 5 eclipses in one year.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top