Understanding the Movement of a Sphere on a Frictionless Surface

AI Thread Summary
When a force is applied to a string attached to the top of a sphere on a frictionless surface, the sphere will both rotate and translate. If the force does not pass through the center of mass, it will create torque, causing the sphere to rotate. The translational movement occurs simultaneously, and the force acting on the center of mass is equivalent to the force applied at the top of the sphere. This scenario can be likened to a sphere floating in space, emphasizing the effects of applied forces. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing motion in frictionless environments.
mbrown3391
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
http://cheeseparade.com/diagram.png

Imagine a sphere on a frictionless surface. A string is attached to the top of the sphere, as shown. If a force is applied to the string, how will the sphere move? Will there be any torque at all, even though there is no friction? Or will the sphere move in exactly the same way as if the string was attached to the side of the sphere?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mbrown3391 said:
Will there be any torque at all, even though there is no friction?
Sure. Your scenario is equivalent to a sphere floating in space. If the force doesn't go through the center of mass, it will start rotating.
 
Ok, that's what i figured. But will there be translational movement as well? If so, how can you describe the force that acts on the center of mass as a function of the force that acts at the top of the sphere?
 
mbrown3391 said:
But will there be translational movement as well?
Yes
mbrown3391 said:
If so, how can you describe the force that acts on the center of mass as a function of the force that acts at the top of the sphere?
They are the same
 
Ok, thanks for you help!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top