Understanding the Need for a Complete Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter glasslp2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Complete
AI Thread Summary
A complete circuit is essential for a continuous flow of current because it ensures charge conservation and adheres to the principle of relativity. Without a complete circuit, electrons would not have a defined path, leading to a violation of charge conservation as they would seemingly disappear and reappear in different locations. Connecting a light bulb to both terminals of a battery allows electrons to flow towards the positive terminal, creating a stable configuration that enables the bulb to light up. The flow of electrons is driven by their attraction to the positive terminal, which is crucial for maintaining current. Thus, a complete circuit is necessary for the effective operation of electrical devices.
glasslp2000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,why do we need a complete ciruit required in order to have a continious flow of current.An early reply will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Ariel:frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by glasslp2000
why do we need a complete ciruit required in order to have a continious flow of current.
Charge conservation and the principle of relativity:

div j = ∂ρ/∂t

and

∂μjμ = 0
(this is the same as above, but you might not have seen it, and it emphasises the relativistic requirement)

Otherwise, electrons would disappear at one point in space and then reappear at another point in space, and this would violate conservation of charge under the principle of relativity (see simultaneity).
 
I really couldn't disagree less with Turin.

(That means I agree with Turin.)

But here's an answer with no tensor calculus involved:

Connect a light bulb to the negative terminal of a battery. The light bulb is neutral, and the electrons in the battery are repelled by each other. (Opposites attract, likes repel.) So some of them will run through the wire to the light bulb. But pretty soon, there's about the same amount of charge everywhere, or rather, the electrons have arranged themselves so that they are least repelled by each other. Imagine attendees of a party that ended badly, awkwardly trying to avoid each other at another party the following week.

It's a stable configuration, once they've all found a corner to sulk in, but not very conducive to light bulbs getting lit up.

To make the light bulb glow, you connect the other side of it to the positive terminal. The electrons are all attracted to this beckoning beacon, and they are much more concerned with reaching the positive terminal than they are with avoiding each other, and to get there they are even willing to pass through the thin filament of the light bulb, heating it to white hot in the process.

But unless there's a positive terminal to go to, they ain't movin'.

Forgive me if it seems that I'm anthropomorphizing electrons; I'm actually electrosizing humans.

P
 
Originally posted by rocketcity
Forgive me if it seems that I'm anthropomorphizing electrons; I'm actually electrosizing humans.

P

That should go in the who wants to be a liar thread.
 
thankyou

Thankyopu everyone:smile:
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top