Understanding the Phase Constant in y(x,t) Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sciencer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Phase
Click For Summary
The phase constant PHI in the wave equation y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - wt - PHI) is crucial for accurately representing wave behavior when the wave does not start at zero at the origin (x=0, t=0). It allows for the shifting of the wave profile in space or time, which can be visualized by comparing wave snapshots at different phase values. When PHI is zero, the wave starts at its maximum or minimum, but introducing PHI shifts this starting point, demonstrating how the wave can move forward or backward. Understanding this shift clarifies the role of PHI in ensuring the equation accommodates various initial conditions. Thus, PHI is essential for capturing the general case of wave behavior.
Sciencer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In the equation
y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - wt - PHI)

I thought I understand why we have that phase constant atleast mathmetically but after thinking about it I don't think I understand it completely like here in my book it says the phase constant moves the wave forward or backward in space or time. Now let's say
we have wave at t = 0 and x = 0;

we would have y(x,t) = ym * sin(-PHI) that wouldn't really move it forward or backward in space or time if we had y(x,t) = ym + PHI then yeh it would have but I don't see how it would moves it backward or forward in that case ?

I can see how they derived
y(x,t) = ym * sin(kx - wt) but that PHI keeps confusing me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might try sketching a 'snapshot' of the wave (that is a graph of y against x) at t = 0, first for the case \phi = 0, then for the case \phi = \pi/2. The shift (in the x direction) of the wave profile brought about by \phi should then be clear.

The purpose of including \phi is so we have an equation which fits the general case: when y doesn't happen to be zero when x = 0 and t = 0. [An alternative, sometimes permissible, sometimes not, is to choose our zero of time (or of x) expressly to ensure that y = 0 and \frac{\partial y}{\partial x} > 0 when t = 0 and x = 0. Then we don't have to bother with \phi.]
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
568
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K