Understanding the Physical Significance of 'a' in Kepler Orbit Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerbearrrrrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The equation r = a(1-e^2)/(1+e cos θ) highlights the role of 'a', the semi-major axis, as a crucial parameter in Kepler's laws of planetary motion. The numerator, a(1-e^2), indicates the maximum radial distance of the orbit, emphasizing its dependence on eccentricity 'e'. Understanding 'a' allows for insights into the average distance of an orbiting body from the central mass. The discussion also touches on alternative representations of the equation that incorporate angular momentum. Overall, 'a' serves as a fundamental measure of orbital size and shape in celestial mechanics.
Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is in the wrong forum.

I have the equation r = \frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e \cos \theta},
and I'm wondering what the physical significance of the numerator is.
More specifically, what is 'a' (since e is what it usually is)?

I've seen various other representations with terms like angular momentum on the top (or rather h^2/GM).

In the context of what I'm doing, it's written this way to (presumably) uncover any implicity 'e'-dependence in the orbit.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
'a' is the semi-major axis of the orbit, or the average value of 'r' for the orbit.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top