Understanding the Physics Behind Gyroscopes

  • Thread starter Thread starter tvlxql9x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
AI Thread Summary
A spinning bicycle wheel suspended from a string demonstrates gyroscopic stability, where it resists falling due to angular momentum. The right-hand rule is a convention used to determine the direction of angular momentum, which plays a crucial role in understanding gyroscopic motion. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the forces acting on the wheel, particularly the lack of sideways force on infinitesimal parts of the wheel. The relationship between torque and angular momentum is essential for explaining the precession observed in gyroscopes. Further exploration of gyroscopic principles can clarify these phenomena.
tvlxql9x
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The other day my physics teacher pulled some sort of magic trick that I'm sure many of you are familiar with. By some sort of witchcraft it seems that a bicycle wheel suspended from a string on one end of the axis won't fall if its spinning fast enough. I am befuddled.

After reading up on a few threads on here about angular momentum it has become apparent that the direction of angular momentum that we use the right hand rule for is just a convention for using it in calculation. I can understand that if you look at the torque applied to the angular momentum their directions seem to cause the wheel to precess, but something about this doesn't seem right. If you look at all the things that are happening to an infinitesimal piece of the wheel (dm if we were integrating) nothing pushes it sideways... I think. There's its linear momentum and the force of gravity. What is going on?!? Can anybody help me out with this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top