Understanding the Relationship between Hamilton and Momentum Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter dream_chaser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamilton Operators
dream_chaser
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
why i\hbar(\partial/\partialt+i\Omega)=i\hbarexp(-i\Omegat)\partial/\partialtexp(i\Omegat)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the RHS you have something that resembles the unitary trasformation of an operator. Where did you get the equation from ?
 
i\hbar(\frac{d}{dt}+ i\Omega) = i\hbar(exp(-i \Omega t) \frac{d}{dt} exp(i \Omega t)

Well if exp(iOt) is your wavefunction, the RHS is just i\hbar(i \Omega )

are you sure this equation is right? Looks like momentum operator, not hamilton.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top