Understanding the Relationship Between Mass and Gravity: A Comprehensive Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter mushhhy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between mass, weight, and gravity, emphasizing that mass is measured in kilograms (kg), weight in Newtons (N), and gravity as acceleration (m/s²). The formula w = mg is highlighted, where weight equals mass multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity, approximately 9.8 m/s². It also explains Newton's second law, F = ma, indicating that force is measured in Newtons, mass in kg, and acceleration in m/s². A point is made about the confusion that can arise when expressing mass in Newtons divided by acceleration instead of the standard kg. Ultimately, the correct understanding of these relationships ensures that the resulting force remains in Newtons.
mushhhy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I hope this is in the proper section, if not sorry.
I need help understanding therelationships between gramass and gravity
masss is m weight is w gravity is g m=w/g, if w is expressed in kg and g in (m/s^2) the resultant will be in Newtons. Is this right or wrong ?

If I am trying to obtain the force F exerted on an object (in Newtons) and the mass is expressed in Newtons and multiplied by the acceleration in (m/s^2) will the answer still be in Newtons ?

Please explain this process to me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do, but I'll make a few comments. An object has mass, which is measured in kg. The object's weight is the gravitational force exerted on it. Force is measured in Newtons. For an object on the Earth's surface, the weight equals mg, where "g" is the "acceleration due to gravity", which is about 9.8 m/s^2. Thus: w = mg.

All of this relates to Newton's 2nd law: F = ma, in which force has units of Newton, mass has units of kg, and acceleration has units of m/s^2. (Note that this is just one common system of units; there are others.)
 
Thanks, can you help with my other posts :bugeye:
 
This might be a cruel lesson in units if you meant that the mass was expressed in Newtons divided by the acceleration, instead of Newtons multiplied by the acceleration.

F=ma, therefore, m=F/a, and units for m could be N/m/s^2.

I have a book that is 2 kg.
I have a book that is 2 N/(m/s^2)

They are the same thing, but people will look at you funny if you express it the 2nd way.

And if this is what they meant, yes, the resulting force will be in Newtons.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top