Understanding the Relationship between Vector Dot and Cross Products

  • Thread starter Thread starter realcomfy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Vector
realcomfy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was looking at an EM problem today and realized I wasn't sure why

(kxH)\dotk = 0

I tried writing it out explicitly and got (w 1,2,3 representing directions)

A1(A2*B3-A3*B2) - A2(A1*B3-A3*B1) + A3(A1*B2-A2*B1)

and I can't see why this should equal zero. This is troubling because the whole dot product of a cross product where one of the vectors is repeated seems to be a general result (of course AxA = 0, that is fine). In fact, I realized I have been using it fairly frequently and wasn't sure why it was so. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well wouldn't kxH give a vector that is perpendicular to both k and H? That vector dot product with k wouild give what then?
 
damn it, i knew it was something that simple. of course the result of the curl operation will be a vector quantity that is perpendicular to both k and H. Then the dot product of perpendicular vectors is zero. Thanks for kicking me in the head ;D
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top