Understanding the Significance of Vector Potential and Gauge Choices in Physics

Thread starter EEngineer91
Start date Jul 31, 2014
Tags

Potential Vector Vector potential

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the physical significance of vector potential in physics, questioning whether it serves merely as a mathematical tool. Participants explore the Aharonov-Bohm effect, emphasizing its implications for the reality of vector potentials. The concept of "gauge choices" is debated, with some arguing that they function more as restrictions than true choices. The conversation highlights the nuanced relationship between mathematical formulations and physical interpretations in quantum mechanics. Overall, the significance of vector potential and gauge choices remains a complex and debated topic in the field.

Jul 31, 2014

EEngineer91

Does the vector potential have physical significance or is it just a mathematical tool? What is your interpretation of Aharanov-Bohm effect? Are "gauge choices" really a choice or a restriction? It seems like gauge choices are really gauge conditions, and in some sense, a restriction. Thoughts? Thanks.

Physics news on Phys.org

Aug 1, 2014

EEngineer91

No input? Really?

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »