Understanding the Thermal Average of Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Please take a look at equation 8.60 in the following link: http://books.google.com/books?id=v5...last equality follows from the fermi"&f=false

My problem is that I cannot see how they go from second last line to \left\langle {c_\nu ^\dag c_\nu } \right\rangle + \left\langle {c_\nu c_\nu ^\dag } \right\rangle. It has something to do with the thermal average of operators (see here equation 1.118, e.g.: http://books.google.com/books?id=v5...epage&q="likewise the thermal average&f=false). I would appreciate a hint very much.


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off all, you know that the thermal average is given by:
\langle c c^\dag\rangle = \frac{1}{Z}\sum_n \langle n|c c^\dag\rangle e^{-\beta n}

You can link to this the expression for the spectral density by insterting the identity operator:

\mathbf{1} = \sum_{n'}|n'\rangle\langle n'|

This is a common trick, so it's good to be familiar with it:

\langle c c^\dag\rangle =\frac{1}{Z}\sum_{n,n'} \langle n|c| n'\rangle\langle n'| c^\dag\rangle e^{-\beta n}

Can you solve it from there?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I believe I can take it from here. Thanks for replying so fast.

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
Just for clarification: When the authors e.g. write something like (eq. 8.61 in http://books.google.com/books?id=v5...last equality follows from the fermi"&f=false) the Greens function G(v, ω), then the v is a set of quantum numbers. By v, is it correct that we are referring to e.g. the many-particle state given by

<br /> \left| { \uparrow \,\, \downarrow } \right\rangle <br />

where (in this specific case) spin up and spin down denote single particle states?

Is it furthermore correct that v can also denote just a single particle state like

<br /> \left| { \uparrow } \right\rangle <br />

?


Niles.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top