Understanding the Uncertainty Principle and Quantum Tunneling

  • Thread starter Thread starter r-dizzel
  • Start date Start date
r-dizzel
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
uncertain about this??

evenin' all!
wonder if anyone can help...

the question is this-

(sorry by the way if this is wrong place to post this, bit of a newbee!)

an electron has 100eV of kinetic energy, its incident on a potential barrier of height 110eV. At what distance x does the probability of finding the electron fall to 1/e of its value at x = 0? compare this with what might of be expeceted from Heisenbergs uncertainty principle.

ive calculated the wavefunctions in and before the boundary but don't really understand what the questions asks "falls to 1/e of its original value"? surely e on its own is meaningless?

the final part about the Heisenbergs unc princ i get but i thought i'd complete the questions.

would really appreciate any help

over and out

r dizzel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably get a better response if you show more of your work explicitly (i.e. the wavefunctions you've calculated). Anyway, presumably you've matched the two wavefunction amplitudes such that they are continuous across the boundary? Then just find the amplitude ratio so that the new amplitude is
e^-^1 = \frac{1}{e^1} = \frac{1}{2.718...}

of the initial value.
 
Last edited:
cheers dude, will have a bash
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top