Understanding the Variation of Poincaré Invariant Action

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfredblase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variation
alfredblase
Messages
228
Reaction score
0
If I have the expression for a Poincaré invariant action, how do I find the variation of the action? Any help/hints much appreciated, thanks ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your action is of the form
<br /> S = \int d\lambda\, L\left(X^\mu, \frac{d X^\mu}{d \lambda} \right),<br />
where \lambda is any affine parameter, then the variation looks like
<br /> \delta S = \int d \lambda \,\left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial X^\mu} - \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial (dX^\mu/d\lambda)}\right)\right) \delta X^\mu,<br />
where in the process I have integrated by parts and dropped the boundary terms.

As usual, you obtain the equations of motion by requring that the variation of the action be zero for arbitrary variations of the path \delta X^\mu. If you are doing your free particle action that we talked about before, you can get the free particle equations of motion by first performing the variation and then setting the affine parameter equal to the proper time.

Consult a text on classical mechanics for further clarification about variational principles and Lagrangians.
 
Last edited:
General Case
The action functional in ordinary spacetime looks like the one from classical physics:
<br /> \mathcal{S}[\phi] = \int d^4x \, \mathcal{L}[\phi, \partial_\mu \phi; x^\mu] \, \quad \mapsto<br /> \quad S = \int dt \, L(q(t), \dot{q(t)}; t) \, .<br />
The most general way to write \delta \mathcal{S} -- without imposing any symmetries -- is to just vary the Lagrangian with respect to the field(s) \phi,
its derivative \partial_\mu \phi, and the coordinates x^\mu:
<br /> \delta \mathcal{S} = \int \delta \phi \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} <br /> + \delta(\partial_\mu \phi) \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)}<br /> + \delta x^\mu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x^\mu} \, .<br />
If you are dealing with global Poincare invariance, the variation with respect to the coordinates vanishes. Have you dealt with
<br /> \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} |\partial_\mu \phi|^2 + \frac{1}{2}m^2 \phi^2<br /> yet?
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot guys, really great stuff! =) Physics Monkey, unfortunately I don't have access to a decent library at the mo, and no money to buy books =(

I suppose I didnt really ask the right questions, sorry, but what is a variation? and what does the basic formula for the variation of an action look like, without integration by parts? Is it the second one given by bigplanet? Whats the difference between global and local invariance?

Is there any website that has good notes on this kind of stuff?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top