Understanding the Work Required to Compress Water Vapor at 200 atm

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vapour Water
AI Thread Summary
The exercise involves compressing water vapor to 99% of its volume at a pressure of 200 atm, raising questions about the process's nature. Clarification is needed on whether the compression occurs quasistatically from atmospheric pressure to 200 atm and whether it is isothermal or adiabatic. The ambiguity in the problem statement leads to confusion regarding the application of pressure and the assumptions necessary for calculations. Understanding the process type is crucial for accurately estimating the work required for this compression. The lack of specific details in the exercise prompts further discussion on the correct approach to solving it.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Okay my exercise says the following:

"By applying a pressure of 200 atm, you can compress water to 99% of its usual volume. Find the work needed to do this."

Now I'm having a bit of trouble with how this is put. For me it doesn't make sense to just put 200atm pressure on normal pressured water vapour. Don't they mean between the lines, that the water has been slowly pressured quasistatically from normal pressure to 200atm pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
we need to know whether this is done isothermally or adiabatically
 
The exact text is: "By applying a pressure of 200atm you can compress water to 99% of its usual volume. Sketch this proces (not neccesarily to scale) on a PV diagram, and estimate the work required to compress a liter of water by this amount. Does the result surprise you?"

Now I just want to know if you are to assume that the water is compressed slowly beggining from atmospheric pressure until 200 atm? It doesn't really make sense to just apply 200atm, or am I reading it wrong? Now you are also right that information lacks about it being adiabatic or isothermal..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top