Understanding Translation Symbology in Scientific Formulas: A Homestudy Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Translation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on translating symbology in scientific formulas, specifically formulas 13, 14, and 15. Key variables include planar coordinates (X and Y), the number of points (n), and standard errors for angle and distance observations (σβ and σs). There is confusion regarding the interpretation of subscripts and the summation notation, particularly whether Xn represents the last coordinate and Xi-1 the preceding coordinates. The example provided clarifies how to sum the differences between coordinates divided by their respective distances. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly understanding the notation for accurate calculations.
Scott S
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Sorry, 30 years since college and I wasn't awake all the time.
I'm trying to translate the symbology in the attached pics.
Some of the super/subscripts are throwing me off in formulae 13, 14 and 15.

Y and X = planar coordinates of points.
n = number of points.
σβ = standard error of angle observation.
σs = standard error of distance observation.
Σ = the sum in parenthesis.
Si = sum of distances.

The parenthesis are the problems.
Would Xn equal the last coordinate and Xi-1 each proceeding coordinate, so that I should sum the final minus each proceeding X?
traverse closure 1.jpg


The same formulae in 3-91.
traverse closure 2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Scott S said:
Sorry, 30 years since college and I wasn't awake all the time.
I'm trying to translate the symbology in the attached pics.
Some of the super/subscripts are throwing me off in formulae 13, 14 and 15.

Y and X = planar coordinates of points.
n = number of points.
σβ = standard error of angle observation.
σs = standard error of distance observation.
Σ = the sum in parenthesis.
Si = sum of distances.

The parenthesis are the problems.
Would Xn equal the last coordinate and Xi-1 each proceeding coordinate, so that I should sum the final minus each proceeding X?
View attachment 96281

The same formulae in 3-91.
View attachment 96282

For example:
\begin{array}{l}\sum_{i=1}^n \left( \frac{X_i - X_{i-1}}{S_i} \right)^2\\<br /> = \left(\frac{X_1-X_0}{S_1}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{X_2 - X_1}{S_2}\right)^2 + \cdots + \left( \frac{X_n - X_{n-1}}{S_n}\right)^2<br /> \end{array}
Is that what you were uncertain about?
 
Yes!
Thank you.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top