Understanding Truss Forces and Solving Equations for Homework Assignments

  • Thread starter Thread starter chetzread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Truss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding the equation 8/BD = x/EB in a truss problem, with participants noting the absence of a point E in the provided diagrams. Several users highlight that the images lack necessary dimensions and angles, making it difficult to solve the problem. It is suggested that the question may be incomplete or improperly stated, as the geometry of the truss is not fully represented. The importance of including all relevant figures and data in homework submissions is emphasized to facilitate accurate problem-solving. Ultimately, without the complete information, the problem remains unsolvable.
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


i don't understand the 8/BD = x/EB
Can anyone explain about it? There's no point E in the diagram...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 270.jpg
    270.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 439
  • 271.jpg
    271.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
chetzread said:
i don't understand the 8/BD = x/EB
I can't see that in your attached images? Is there an image missing?
 
billy_joule said:
I can't see that in your attached images? Is there an image missing?
in post#1
 
billy_joule said:
I can't see that in your attached images? Is there an image missing?
 

Attachments

  • 270.jpg
    270.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 456
  • 271.jpg
    271.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 387
chetzread said:
in post#1
Yeah, I see the two images in your OP and then again in post #4.

But I don't see this term:
chetzread said:
i don't understand the 8/BD = x/EB
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
billy_joule said:
Yeah, I see the two images in your OP and then again in post #4.

But I don't see this term:
here
 

Attachments

  • 271.jpg
    271.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 402
  • 272.jpg
    272.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 430
Ok.
We still don't have the full problem statement as the dimensions of the structure don't appear in any of your three images.
I'm guessing the calc is some geometry to find some unknown length. Maybe E is a typo. Hard to say really, that's why PF homework rules state that you must include the entire question :wink:
 
billy_joule said:
Ok.
We still don't have the full problem statement as the dimensions of the structure don't appear in any of your three images.
I'm guessing the calc is some geometry to find some unknown length. Maybe E is a typo. Hard to say really, that's why PF homework rules state that you must include the entire question :wink:
in second image of post #6
 
chetzread said:
in second image of post #6
I see no dimensions (or angles) on either image in post #6. The second image appears to be part of the worked solution, how could you be expected to solve the problem if the geometry of the truss isn't given?
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #10
chetzread said:
i don't understand the 8/BD = x/EB
Can anyone explain about it? There's no point E in the diagram...
We need you to post the complete figure and data for the problem as given. There are no dimensions marked on what you have provided.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #11
billy_joule said:
I see no dimensions (or angles) on either image in post #6. The second image appears to be part of the worked solution, how could you be expected to solve the problem if the geometry of the truss isn't given?
the full exact question is in photo 271...That's the complete question...
why it's /BD = x/EB?
 
  • #12
chetzread said:
the full exact question is in photo 271...That's the complete question...
Well, then the question is incomplete and unsolvable.
 
  • #13
You don't need dimensions in a statically determinate frame - just the proportions. Guessing that the left hand triangle is in a 3/4/5/ proportion, the figures 6 and 8 make sense. The choices of forces as multiples of 14 suggest the question is looking for an answer that can be achieved without a calculator. The suggested reactions are wrong in my opinion and this reinforces the notion that it is useless to look for internal forces if the external reactions are incorrect. The external reactions should have been checked, for example by taking moments about any point not already used to obtain tham.
 
Back
Top