Understanding Vector Magnitude and Components: Common Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter eraemia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses two key questions about vectors: the dependence of vector magnitude on the reference frame and the possibility of negative vector components. It clarifies that the magnitude of a vector remains constant regardless of the reference frame, even if that frame is in motion. However, confusion arises regarding whether the question pertains to the original vector or its resultant. Additionally, it is confirmed that a vector component can indeed be negative if it points in the opposite direction of the positive axis. Overall, the magnitude of a vector is invariant, while its components can vary based on direction.
eraemia
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have two questions on vectors:
1) Does the magnitude of a vector vary depending on how one chooses a reference frame?
2) Can a component of a vector be negative?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



1) No, because regardless of the reference frame, the magnitude is always the same?
2) Yes, say if the vector points -y or -x or -z
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) is wrong, I think.

because what if frame of reference is also moving at the velocity of v, where v is the velocity of the object being observed?..
 
Yeah, that makes sense. But doesn't the vector remain the same? For example, if I have a vector of 5m/s north, it remains that vector whether or not the reference frame is stationery Earth or a train moving at 10m/s north... Or is the question asking like the magnitude of the object and not the vector? Sorry, I'm confusing.
 
I am not sure if they are asking for resultant vector, or that original vector... (refer to those relatve motion questions)
mag. of the resultant != mag of org

yea, otherwise org. vectors remains that same vector unless some force is applied to it..
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top