Understanding velocity and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on velocity and acceleration, the relationship between average speed and instantaneous speed is clarified, emphasizing that they cannot be represented by the same variable unless acceleration is zero. The equation v = s/t defines average speed, while acceleration is expressed as a = dv/dt, where v denotes instantaneous speed. The differentiation mentioned is only valid if distance (s) is constant and time (t) is variable. The derivation of velocity from acceleration assumes a constant acceleration, leading to the equation v = u + at. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate motion analysis.
coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
speed = distance/time
v=s/t
Acceleration = dv/dt = -s/t^2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the equation v = s/t, 'v' represents average speed over the period from time 0 to time t.

In the equation accel = dv/dt, 'v' represents instantaneous speed at time t.

Unless acceleration is always zero, average speed and instantaneous speed are different items, and cannot be represented by the same variable letter ('v' in this case).
 
  • Like
Likes coverband
Another thing to add is that the differentiation in post #1 would be valid only if ##s## were a constant and ##t## were a variable. Does that make sense?
 
DrGreg said:
Another thing to add is that the differentiation in post #1 would be valid only if ##s## were a constant and ##t## were a variable. Does that make sense?

No because when deriving an equation for v we start with a = dv/dt -> dv = a dt -> v=[int]a dt -> v = u + at. This is how Wikipedia derives the first equation of motion. They treat a as a constant. Thanks for your first answer though
 
coverband said:
No because when deriving an equation for v we start with a = dv/dt -> dv = a dt -> v=[int]a dt -> v = u + at. This is how Wikipedia derives the first equation of motion. They treat a as a constant. Thanks for your first answer though
I said constant ##s##, not constant ##a##. My comments refer specifically to $$
\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{s}{t} \right) = -\frac{s}{t^2},
$$which is valid only if ##s## is constant.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
827
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top