Understanding Virial Theorem: Comparing Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between two equations related to the Virial Theorem found in an astrophysics book and a Wikipedia article. The equation from the book expresses pressure in terms of gravitational energy and volume, while the Wikipedia version uses kinetic and potential energy along with the concept of "virial." Despite the different variables, it is suggested that both formulations should yield equivalent results. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the context and definitions of the variables used in each equation. Clarifying these distinctions can enhance comprehension of the Virial Theorem in astrophysics.
Stratosphere
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
In my astrophysics book, it says it's \bar{P}=-\frac{1}{3}\frac{E_{gr}}{V}

This Wikipedia article has a different equation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem

Can someone explain the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stratosphere said:
In my astrophysics book, it says it's \bar{P}=-\frac{1}{3}\frac{E_{gr}}{V}

This Wikipedia article has a different equation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem

Can someone explain the difference?

Yes; the variables being used are different. Your formula is using pressure and volume. Wikipedia is using kinetic and potential energy, and the "virial". Should work out to be the same, I think.

Cheers -- sylas
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top