Understanding Voltage and Current Relationships in Inductors and Capacitors

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the mathematical relationships between voltage and current in inductors and capacitors using phasor notation. For inductors, the equation V = j(ω)LI indicates that voltage leads current by 90 degrees. Conversely, for capacitors, the equation I = j(ω)CV shows that current leads voltage by 90 degrees. The differentiation of sine waves and the application of Euler's identity are key to understanding these phase relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phasor notation in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with differential equations in circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of Euler's identity and its application
  • Basic concepts of inductors and capacitors in AC circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of phasor relationships in AC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of phase shifts in signal processing
  • Explore the use of differential equations in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the role of frequency in inductive and capacitive reactance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in AC circuit analysis will benefit from this discussion.

leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
This is probably a stupid question, and I realized the answer before, and I know my professor explained this in class, but why does voltage lead current for inductors and current lead voltage for capacitors. I don't want a physical explanation but a mathematical one. I am looking at my circuits notes and my professor states that it is obvious from the following equations that this is true.

V = j(omega)LI and I = j(omega)CV, where omega is frequency and I and V are the current and voltage phasors.

I know this is stupid because I was able to answer this question myself fairly easily just by looking at the equations, but now I look at them again and cannot answer this question for the life of me. SOMEONE HELP ME! :(

If I can't figure this out on my own then I will ask my professor tomorrow, but I'd rather not ask such a question since he states that it is obvious in his lecture notes.

Thanks a lot.edit: I suppose if you plug the phasors into the above equations and then convert them from exponential form to trigonometric form using euler's identity the sine expression becomes the real part (formerly the imaginary part) and then the cosine expression becomes the imaginary part (formerly the real part). Making the sine expression the real part would make the wave 90 degrees out of phase. Is this correct? I remember realizing the answer to this question before and my reasoning seemed much simpler.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just write the differential equations for voltage and current in the two situations.

V = L di/dt

I = C dv/dt

And remember that when you differentiate a sine wave, you get the cosine function. So current lags the voltage in an inductor, and voltage lags the current in a capacitor. Make sense?
 
berkeman said:
Just write the differential equations for voltage and current in the two situations.

V = L di/dt

I = C dv/dt

And remember that when you differentiate a sine wave, you get the cosine function. So current lags the voltage in an inductor, and voltage lags the current in a capacitor. Make sense?

yes, but I wanted to know why the above phasor relationships explain it, since my notes say that they do.
 
Do you know where the phasor notation comes from? For the inductor case, write the current i(t) = exp(jwt) and differentiate. So di(t)/dt = jwi(t). You can also think of a multiplication by j as a counterclockwise rotation by 90 degrees on the phasor diagram...
 
Realizing that j = e^{j\frac{\pi}{2}}, multiplying by j amounts to adding 90 degrees to the exponential. In elaboration of what berkeman has described:

V = L \frac{di}{dt}=L j \omega e^{j \omega t} = L \omega e^{j( \omega t + \frac {\pi}{2}).
The output voltage (V) is ahead (leads) the input current (I) by 90 degrees through an inductor. (Plot it and you can see). By analogous reasoning, you can show current leading voltage by 90 degrees across a capacitor.
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
Do you know where the phasor notation comes from? For the inductor case, write the current i(t) = exp(jwt) and differentiate. So di(t)/dt = jwi(t). You can also think of a multiplication by j as a counterclockwise rotation by 90 degrees on the phasor diagram...

yeah, I know where the phasor notation comes from. This description makes sense. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K