Understanding Water Pressure in Mississippi Flooding and Levee-Dwelling Homes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mechanics of water pressure and soil saturation in the context of Mississippi flooding and levee construction. It questions why homes surrounded by levees remain dry despite the surrounding floodwaters, suggesting that water should permeate the ground and equalize pressure. Responses indicate that while water does permeate slowly, it often occurs at a rate too slow to affect the homes before floodwaters recede. Additionally, the permeability of the soil plays a crucial role, as areas with high rock or gravel content may not absorb water effectively. Overall, the interaction between floodwater pressure and soil conditions is complex and site-specific.
RickVS
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
WRT the Mississippi flooding, you see pictures of homes with levees surrounding them that the homeowners built. It keeps the water out. Here is my question. The ground beneath the flood waters has to be soaked. Wouldn't this water permeate the dry ground right next to it under the levee like when a paper towel absorbs water and the water spreads as it gets soaked up? And if the ground under and inside the levee is soaked, then how come the enormous pressure of the surrounding waters don't just percolate up through the ground and fill in the area inside the levee until the water level, and pressure, is equal to the water levels surrounding it? These homes, for the most part, are bone dry, or at least dry enough to not pool water (with one exception that I saw, but even then it just pooled and that was it). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RickVS said:
WRT the Mississippi flooding, you see pictures of homes with levees surrounding them that the homeowners built. It keeps the water out. Here is my question. The ground beneath the flood waters has to be soaked. Wouldn't this water permeate the dry ground right next to it under the levee like when a paper towel absorbs water and the water spreads as it gets soaked up? And if the ground under and inside the levee is soaked, then how come the enormous pressure of the surrounding waters don't just percolate up through the ground and fill in the area inside the levee until the water level, and pressure, is equal to the water levels surrounding it? These homes, for the most part, are bone dry, or at least dry enough to not pool water (with one exception that I saw, but even then it just pooled and that was it). Thanks.

I think that does happen, it just happens very slowly, and the floodwaters generally recede before it can happen to any appreciable extent. For example, the polders (reclaimed farmland that lies below sea level) in Holland need to be pumped out periodically to keep them dry.
 
For example, the polders (reclaimed farmland that lies below sea level) in Holland need to be pumped out periodically to keep them dry.

We have an even more esoteric system where I live.

Good answer, by the way.
 
RickVS said:
Wouldn't this water permeate the dry ground right next to it under the levee like when a paper towel absorbs water and the water spreads as it gets soaked up?

Perhaps, but this is very site-specific. That is, the degree of permeation(thus saturation) is generally dependent on porosity.
Not sure about the area where your referring to, but I've seen ground with well over 70% solid rock, or large concentrations of solid gravel, or other soil conditions/compositions which do not lend themselves to ready saturation(due to extremely low porosity)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top