Underwater Express power and propulsion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential power and propulsion methods for DARPA's underwater express program, particularly focusing on supercavitating submarines capable of exceeding 100 knots. One proposed method involves using a fission reactor to generate steam, which could be expelled for propulsion, while also considering the use of an electric pump to manage water flow. The concept of creating a cavitation bubble is explored, with suggestions for using a washer-type plate to facilitate this process. Additionally, there are considerations regarding the management of waste heat, either by integrating it into the propulsion system or using it to enhance cavitation. Environmental concerns related to the discharge of steam or hot water are also raised, inviting further discussion on the implications.
kgbgru
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I am fascinated with the idea of supercavitating subs, and DARPA's underwater express program has caught my fancy. A sub that can go faster than 100 knots submerged, now that is too cool. I am curious as to speculation on how Electric Boat will power and propel the ship.
The idea I personally like is to use the heat of a fission reactor to heat water to steam and shoot it out the back like a steam rocket. I suppose that an electric powered pump would suffice to pump water through the system. You could also use some of that steam for the cavitation bubble. I can't deciide how to make the cavitation bubble. Do you think that a simple washer type plate pushing through the water would be enough?
My best guess as to a heatsink for this system would be to dump the waste hear into the water taken in by the propulsion system before it is heated by propulsion power. Or to dump the waste heat into the cavitation generator at the front of the boat to help form the bubble.
I would like to hear your opinions on my idea and hear other ideas as to power and move this boat. Thanks, I look foward to your ideas.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Would the steam or hot water have environmental concerns?
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top