Ex1 said:
To close the loop on this one, I wrote recommendation in congenial tones but didn't specifically recommend it. Unfortunately, perhaps it didn't go down too well as I've just been shouted and ranted at by my supervisor for 45 minutes non-stop about how stupid and useless I am. "As much use as a letter to Father Christmas" is the quote that sticks in my mind.
Apparently, the last 6 months of my life have been a waste of time and the components I need to complete my project will now not be ordered.
Given that I've had no other interaction with him apart from writing the note since last week - when I was "an excellent student with no problems" (his words) - I think perhaps it didn't go down too well. :(
Ex, it would be nice if justice prevailed all of the time. Many persons, sometimes those with religious faith and sometimes it those who just believe in something like
karma, believe that justice will ultimately prevail (the Magna Charta in the U.K., desegregation and civil rights in the U.S. South, hell it looks like the U.S. may very well have their first black president with a middle name "Hussein" and last name that sounds sort of like "Osama" and had a muslim father, I would have never expected this 4 years ago).
Anyway, there is a period of time when the injustice appears to be prevailing, but assuming your ethical position was based upon
truth (facts that can be verified by other, third parties) and on the common good, this "truth" has a way of resisting being bottled up and finds its way out of attempts to contain it. Perhaps someday you will be vindicated and your supervisor will be embarrassed.
It looks like (lacking knowledge of the specifics) you did the right thing in writing the report dispassionately and neutrally. Unless you're a lawyer defending a client that you know is guilty as hell, no one can expect you to make a case for something you just don't believe in. Let
them make that case. If they want you to do the dirty work for them, perhaps it is to set you up to cover their ass, and if that's the case, they have knowledge of their own culpability.
But if you do the right thing (sometimes in "speaking truth to power") don't expect vindication right away. The sword that people in power carry is real, not trivial, and to be reckoned with. You might just be feeling its sting. This is when personal integrity and courage become salient attributes. You have my admiration and best wishes (unless, of course, when the facts are known I think your super is right and you are wrong, but I sort of doubt it if he wanted
you to plug the case
he advocates without respect to your position on it). Good luck.
Edit: Sounds like you are a student in university-level academics. One last suggestion -> consider going over this guy's head. Is he a prof? Go to the department chair. Is he the department chair? Then go to the Dean. Tell this guy's boss what his previous evaluation of you was ("an excellent student with no problems"), what he expected you to do, what you did, how he reacted, and the consequences you have experienced. Let that guy's boss evaluate the justice or injustice of it. Be prepared for a decision that is not entirely to your liking, but if your case is "true" (verifiable) and congruent to the common-good, and you know how to express that case persuasively enough that a 3
rd party can understand it (from your POV), you might be pleasantly surprized. But just becoming a student who works for a particular prof does not mean that you give up your freedom of conscience and you have to become his mouthpeice (which might mean that you have to take the flak for what happens when you advocate his case). That's very unfair.