Unexplained voltage loss in a simple voltage divider

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an unexplained voltage loss in a simple voltage divider circuit designed to step down 9V DC using two resistors (3.3M ohm and 2.7M ohm). Participants explore the measurements taken across the resistors and the implications of multimeter resistance on the circuit's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports measuring 9.5V across the voltage divider, with 2.2V across the 3.3M ohm resistor and 1.8V across the 2.7M ohm resistor, expressing confusion about the missing voltage.
  • Another participant suggests that the multimeter's internal resistance (approximately 1 megohm) affects the voltage readings, proposing a calculation to illustrate how it alters the voltage divider's behavior.
  • A different participant proposes compensating for the multimeter's resistance to calculate the 'real', unloaded voltage values as a potential solution.
  • One participant warns that using such high resistor values in a voltage divider limits the current to very low levels (1.5uA), which may not be sufficient for practical applications, suggesting a voltage regulator as a better alternative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the cause of the voltage loss and the implications of multimeter resistance. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the issue, with multiple competing suggestions presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations related to the assumptions about the circuit's loading conditions and the impact of measurement tools on the observed results. The calculations and suggestions provided depend on specific configurations and may not apply universally.

lukeex
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey guys,

I am currently trying to implement a voltage divider to step down from 9V DC for a digital output.

I am using two resistors, 3.3M ohm & 2.7M ohm in series.

When I measure the voltage across both of them using a multimeter I get 9.5V

Across the 3.3M ohm resistor I get 2.2V and across the 2.7M ohm resistor 1.8V.

I don't have any idea where I have lost the 5V and there is no other resistances in series, it is connected straight to a 9V battery, using a breadboard.

If anyone has any suggestions at all it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your multimeter has a resistance of about 1 megohm, and it is upsetting the voltage divider when it is in circuit.

For example, put a resistance of 1.188 Meg across the 3.3 Meg resistor. The parallel combination would be 873 K

Now use this as a voltage divider and you get 873 / (873 + 2700) times 9 or 2.2 volts.

Your multimeter is behaving like that 1.188 Meg resistor.

You can get better multimeters that have a resistance of 10 Megs but they cost a bit more.
 
Or you could just compensate for the meter resistance and calculate the 'real', unloaded value. That would be a cheaper solution.
 
lukex,

You are likely to run into other problems using 3.3M & 2.7M voltage divider to power anything! The nominal current through your voltage divider is 1.5uA ( 9V/6M = 1.5uA). Assuming you have the 2.7M resistor connected to V+ and the 3.3M connected to ground, you would have a nominal 4.95V where the two resistors are connected; however, as soon as you put any sort of load in parallel with the 3.3M resistor (that is, attempt to use the 4.95V), the maximum current that can flow is limited by the 2.7M resistor to 3.3uA. There are very few circuits that are going to be useful with a maximum of 3.3uA.

You would likely be far better off to simply use a 7805 voltage regulator (or similar) to obtain your 5V if you need any current at all.

Fish
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K