Unexplained voltage loss in a simple voltage divider

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a voltage divider using 3.3M ohm and 2.7M ohm resistors to step down 9V DC, where unexpected voltage readings are observed. The multimeter's resistance of approximately 1 megohm is affecting the measurements by altering the voltage divider's behavior. Suggestions include using a multimeter with higher resistance or compensating for the meter's effect to calculate the true voltage. Additionally, the low current output of the voltage divider (1.5uA) limits its practical use for powering circuits, making a 7805 voltage regulator a more effective solution for obtaining 5V. The conversation highlights the importance of considering load effects and multimeter characteristics in voltage divider applications.
lukeex
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey guys,

I am currently trying to implement a voltage divider to step down from 9V DC for a digital output.

I am using two resistors, 3.3M ohm & 2.7M ohm in series.

When I measure the voltage across both of them using a multimeter I get 9.5V

Across the 3.3M ohm resistor I get 2.2V and across the 2.7M ohm resistor 1.8V.

I don't have any idea where I have lost the 5V and there is no other resistances in series, it is connected straight to a 9V battery, using a breadboard.

If anyone has any suggestions at all it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your multimeter has a resistance of about 1 megohm, and it is upsetting the voltage divider when it is in circuit.

For example, put a resistance of 1.188 Meg across the 3.3 Meg resistor. The parallel combination would be 873 K

Now use this as a voltage divider and you get 873 / (873 + 2700) times 9 or 2.2 volts.

Your multimeter is behaving like that 1.188 Meg resistor.

You can get better multimeters that have a resistance of 10 Megs but they cost a bit more.
 
Or you could just compensate for the meter resistance and calculate the 'real', unloaded value. That would be a cheaper solution.
 
lukex,

You are likely to run into other problems using 3.3M & 2.7M voltage divider to power anything! The nominal current through your voltage divider is 1.5uA ( 9V/6M = 1.5uA). Assuming you have the 2.7M resistor connected to V+ and the 3.3M connected to ground, you would have a nominal 4.95V where the two resistors are connected; however, as soon as you put any sort of load in parallel with the 3.3M resistor (that is, attempt to use the 4.95V), the maximum current that can flow is limited by the 2.7M resistor to 3.3uA. There are very few circuits that are going to be useful with a maximum of 3.3uA.

You would likely be far better off to simply use a 7805 voltage regulator (or similar) to obtain your 5V if you need any current at all.

Fish
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top