Uniform circular motion and coordinate system

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, the vertical component of the position vector is greatest at 90 degrees and 270 degrees, where the vector aligns with the y-axis. The vertical component of the particle's velocity is also greatest at these angles, as velocity is tangential to the circle and points in the y direction at these points. The vertical component of acceleration reaches its maximum at 90 degrees and 270 degrees, where it has a purely vertical component. The discussion clarifies that the position vector is indeed a vector, not just a scalar distance. Understanding these components is essential for analyzing circular motion in a coordinate system.
ace123
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
2. In the figure below the particle P is in uniform circular motion. The motion is centered on the origin of an xy coordinate system.
(a) At what values of \vartheta is the vertical component r_{y} of the position vector greatest in magnitude?
(b) At what values of \vartheta is the vertical component v_{y} of the particle’s velocity greatest in magnitude?
(c) At what values of \vartheta is the vertical component a_{y} of the particle’s acceleration greatest in magnitude?

a. How can radius have a vertical component? It's just a distance or would it be a displacement?

b. Isn't velocity always tangential to the circle so how would there be a y component? Or does he just mean when it points in the y direction like at zero and 180 degrees?

c. Would it be 90 degrees and 270 because it only has a vertical component?

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The figure is in my gravitational force post. I don't know how to move it. It's question 2.
 
You have the basic idea correct. The magnitude of the y component of each vector is greatest when the whole vector lies along the y-axis. So, your answers to b) and c) are correct.

For part a) you are working with a position vector, not just a distance. The radial position vector points outward from the origin toward the object. Can you answer part a) now?
 
Yea I can answer it now. I just didn't know it was a vector thought it was just a scalar. Shouldn't it just be at 90 degrees and 270 again?
 
ace123 said:
Yea I can answer it now. I just didn't know it was a vector thought it was just a scalar. Shouldn't it just be at 90 degrees and 270 again?

You got it.:smile:
 
Thanks for the help
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top