Uniform circular motion - frequency vs. centripetal force.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the relationship between centripetal force and frequency in horizontal circular motion, with a constant radius of 60 cm. The equation f = k^Fc is proposed, but its relevance to circular motion is questioned. A detailed derivation shows that centripetal force can be expressed as F = mRf^2, linking it to frequency. The conversation also touches on the relationship between tangential speed, angular speed, and frequency. Ultimately, the participants aim to establish a theoretical gradient for the log(frequency) vs. log(centripetal force) graph.
titaniumfever
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need to find a relationship between the centripetal force and frequency of horizontal circular motion, and then find the theoretical gradient of the graph between log(frequency) vs. log(centripetal force). The radius of the string used was constant at 60cm.

I think that f = k^Fc where k is any constant is an equation, but not completely sure of that.

It isn't helping that the equation above provides me with log(f) = Fc*log(k), when I need to find log(f) as a function of log(Fc)...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
titaniumfever said:
I need to find a relationship between the centripetal force and frequency of horizontal circular motion, and then find the theoretical gradient of the graph between log(frequency) vs. log(centripetal force). The radius of the string used was constant at 60cm.

I think that f = k^Fc where k is any constant is an equation, but not completely sure of that.
What is the relationship between centripetal force and tangential speed? How is tangential speed related to angular speed or the frequency of circular motion?

AM
 
I think that f = k^Fc where k is any constant is an equation, but not completely sure of that.
Well, that certainly is an equation, but it doesn't have anything to do with circular motion!

If an object moves on a circle of radius R, we can write the "position vector" as Rcos(\omega t)\vec{i}+ Rsin(\omega t)\vec{j}. Since sine and cosine have period 2\pi, that will have period T where \omega T= 2\pi or T= 2\pi/\omega and \omega= 2\pi/T. The frequency, in radians per second, is T/2\pi. With \vec{r}= R cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}+ R sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}, the velocity vector is the derivative, \vec{v}= -2\pi R/T sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}+ 2\pi R/T cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}, and the acceleration is the second deriative, \vec{a}= -4\pi^2 R/T^2 cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}- 4\pi^2 R/T^2 sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}. Since "Force = mass *acceleration", the strength of the force holding the mass in circular motion must be F= 4m\pi^2 R/T^2 and, since f= 2\pi/T, F= mRf^2
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, that certainly is an equation, but it doesn't have anything to do with circular motion!

If an object moves on a circle of radius R, we can write the "position vector" as Rcos(\omega t)\vec{i}+ Rsin(\omega t)\vec{j}. Since sine and cosine have period 2\pi, that will have period T where \omega T= 2\pi or T= 2\pi/\omega and \omega= 2\pi/T. The frequency, in radians per second, is T/2\pi. With \vec{r}= R cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}+ R sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}, the velocity vector is the derivative, \vec{v}= -2\pi R/T sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}+ 2\pi R/T cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}, and the acceleration is the second deriative, \vec{a}= -4\pi^2 R/T^2 cos(2\pi t/T)\vec{i}- 4\pi^2 R/T^2 sin(2\pi t/T)\vec{j}. Since "Force = mass *acceleration", the strength of the force holding the mass in circular motion must be F= 4m\pi^2 R/T^2 and, since f= 2\pi/T, F= mRf^2
I think it is simpler to use F = ma = mv^2/r where v = 2\pi r/T = 2\pi r\nu. It is pretty easy to work out F as a function of frequency \nu from that.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top