Uniform circular motion with unknown mass

AI Thread Summary
A satellite orbits an unknown planet with a speed of 1.7x10^4 m/s at a radius of 5.25x10^6 meters, while a second satellite orbits at a radius of 8.6x10^6 meters. The discussion focuses on finding the orbital speed of the second satellite using the relationship between centripetal and gravitational forces. It is suggested that the centripetal acceleration of the first satellite can be used to derive a formula that equates the gravitational force to the centripetal force. By simplifying the equations and using proportionality, the variables can be isolated to find the unknown speed of the second satellite. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the forces acting on the satellites.
Emil Zapotec
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite is in a circular orbit around an unknown planet. The satellite has a speed of 1.7x10^4 m/s and the radius is 5.25x10^6 meters. A second satellite also has a circular orbit around the same planet and has an orbit radius of 8.6x10^6 meters. What is the orbital speed of the second satellite?

The Attempt at a Solution


I was wondering if I have to find the centripetal acceleration of the first satellite. If so I know the acceleration is 55.05 m/s^2. But I'm stuck on what to do with there because I don't even know if that acceleration is relevance and how you work it into mv^2/r
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What force is causing the satellite to be in circular orbit? Do you know any equations for this force?
 
The only force would be the gravitational force of the unknown planet. But there's no information about the planet, only that a satellite rotates around it, so I'm assuming there's a formula that I need to derive where a mass needs to cancel?
 
As the gravitational force is the only force, how about equating it to the centripetal force?
 
Oh, so just find the centripetal force of the first one, find out what it is and equate it to the centripetal force of the satellite with the unknown velocity? I guess I made it a lot harder than I thought, thanks a lot.
 
Well, the centripetal force of the first satellite isn't the same as the centripetal force on the second satellite. But, once you've equated the centripetal force and gravitational forces together, can you re-write the expression so one side of the equation has only constants, and the other side has the variables. Now, as one side has only constants, you can equate the variables of the two satellites. I guess I'm saying use proportionality, but in a really round-about way!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top