Uniform Electric Fields: Understanding Coulomb's Law and Field Intensity

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's Law, represented as F = kqq/r^2, applies to point charges, but the discussion focuses on uniform electric fields created by infinite planar charge distributions. The intensity of a uniform electric field remains constant in the middle because it is derived from the collective effect of many point charges, which can be analyzed using Gauss's Law. This law shows that the electric field produced by an infinite sheet of charge is uniform on both sides, with opposing directions. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the nature of electric fields near charged plates versus point charges. Understanding these principles clarifies how uniform electric fields can exist despite the behavior of individual charges.
datsqnp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Coulomb's Law
F = kqq/r^2

Why does the intensity of a uniform electric field not get weaker in the middle? I would understand this if the intensity over distance was a linear function, but it isn't. The force near one of the plates would approach infinity, because r^2 is so small... but in the middle of the field even the forces of each side added up would not approach infinity, which means the field is not uniform. How are uniform electric fields possible?
 

Attachments

  • unif_elec2.png
    unif_elec2.png
    6 KB · Views: 538
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very confusing post.

The expression for the Coulomb's law that you wrote is for a point or spherical charge distribution. Yet, you are talking about "plates" here.

For an infinite planar charge distribution, use Gauss's law and figure out the expression for the E-field. It is NOT the same as what you have written.

Zz.
 
Or, you can find the electric field produced by a uniform plane sheet of charge by treating it as a collection of point charges and integrating over the whole sheet. If the sheet is large enough to be effectively "infinite" in size, you get the result that the field is uniform on either side of the sheet, in opposite directions on the two sides. (Using Gauss's Law is much quicker, if you know it and understand it.)
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top