Uniform magnetic field in a spherical region

fysikgubbe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is it possible to design a current winding that will produce a uniform magnetic field in a spherical region of space?


Homework Equations


Well, the literature tells that the equation for the B-field for a uniformly magnetized sphere = (2/3)u_0 * M and also the magnetization current density = J = curlM may be helpful.


The Attempt at a Solution



The truth is that I don't even have a clue where to begin or how to think. Really need some help on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "a uniform magnetic field in a spherical region of space"? Does the field have to be 0 outside the spherical region or something? If you just want a uniform field, a solenoid or Helmholtz coil can easily provide one. Define an arbitrary but small spherical region and you'd have a uniform field in a spherical region of space.
 
Neither a finite-length solenoid nor a Helmholtz coil produce a perfectly uniform field, even though both are widely used because their fields are uniform enough for many practical applications.

It is possible in theory to generate a perfectly uniform B field from currents on the surface of a sphere. I think you made a good start by realizing that a magnetized sphere has uniform B inside. The current density equation you wrote down, though, is appropriate for current inside the volume and you will need to deal with the discontinuity at the surface. This has been done for you already in the form of the boundary condition that gives equivalent surface current density at the material/air boundary. Take a look at that equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top