Uniform, non-zero electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the direction of a uniform electric field given that the voltage remains constant at two points, x = 1.00 m and x = 3.00 m, both at 4.00 V. It is established that for the electric field to maintain equal voltage, the field must be oriented such that the equipotential lines are perpendicular to the electric field lines. The participants suggest that the electric field can point either upwards or downwards, depending on the orientation of the positive and negative plates. However, there is confusion about identifying four distinct directions for the electric field, as only two have been clearly articulated. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between electric field direction and equipotential surfaces.
A_lilah
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At x = 1.00 m, the voltage is 4.00 V. At x = 3.00 m, the voltage is also 4.00 V. Assuming that there is a steady, uniform non-zero electric field over this entire region, give four possible directions of that electric field.


Homework Equations



E = (delta V)/d
Ue = qV
(the electric potential = charge * voltage)

I'm not entirely sure, these are just the ones that sort of relate the electric field with voltage.


The Attempt at a Solution



For these charges to have an equal voltage in the electric field, the force of the electric field * the distance between either charge and one of the plates should = 0 (from the first equation above), so anywhere in the field where they are at the same y coordinate (in line with each other), they should have the same voltage. This gives me two directions for the field- it can point up or down (switching the positive and negative plates) and the voltages could be the same:

- - - - - - - -
____________ <-- negative plate

^ ^ ^ ^ <---direction 1
--(1m)----(3m)------------------->x axis
____________ <-- positive plate
+ + + + + + +

and if you switch the negative and positive plates, the field points down, my second direction, but I don't see how you could have two additional directions, so perhaps I am thinking about this wrong. Any insight would be great! thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi A_lilah! :smile:

(have a delta: ∆ :wink:)

Hint: if a uniform electric field is North, where are the lines (or surfaces) of equal voltage (equal electric potental)? :smile:
 
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by north~ do you mean pointing upwards? The equipotential lines are perpendicular to the electric field lines...
 
A_lilah said:
The equipotential lines are perpendicular to the electric field lines...

That's right. :smile:

So …
A_lilah said:
At x = 1.00 m, the voltage is 4.00 V. At x = 3.00 m, the voltage is also 4.00 V. Assuming that there is a steady, uniform non-zero electric field over this entire region, give four possible directions of that electric field.

:wink:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top