Gib Z said:
Perhaps I am using the letter N differently to you lol. N means the set of the Natural numbers, which basically means the positive integers. This set only includes 1,2,3... etc etc
But A_1 includes 0.5, since A_1 means "All real numbers between 0 and 1, not inclusive", which 0.5 certainly satisfies =] But the open interval (0,infinity) has all the Positive integers, and more, like the 0.5 I just said. So that's the difference between (0,infinity) and N =]
(0,infinity) is commonly denoted by \mathrr{R^{+}}, ie the Positive real numbers.
Your definition conflicted with what my book says (That N = {0, 1, 2, ...}... aka, it includes zero), so I did some research, and apparently we're both right :O
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number
"In mathematics, a natural number can mean either an element of the set {1, 2, 3, ...} (the positive integers or the counting numbers) or an element of the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} (the non-negative integers). The former is generally used in number theory, while the latter is preferred in mathematical logic, set theory, and computer science. See below for a formal definition."
But yeah, I forgot about decimals =/ Wraskley (lol, spelling? XD) little numbers they are...
However, with R+, we then get into the debate about if zero is positive =/
My book says R+ does not include zero... so for my work, I'll be putting down (0,infinity).
However, in all honesty, I don't know what zero is :P
To me, it is either:
- Neutral (Not positive or negative)
- Both (-0 = +0 = 0, therefore it is positive, and negative at the same time)
Ohhhh... *bonks self on head*... but our answer doesn't include zero anyway, so R+ works...
Hah. I love how you say something, and it seems off to me at first, then I try to explain why it seems off, but in explaining, I realize MY OWN mistake, and see how you're right :P
Yay! My thoughts work in proof by contradiction ;)
Yes, I'm a confused child, don't mind me :P
LOL ^^;