Unique Eigenvector of a: Unveiling Coherent States

naele
Messages
199
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that, for all complexe numbers \alpha, a has a unique eigenvector |\alpha\rangle that is nothing else but the coherent state
<br /> \psi(x)=\frac{e^{-\frac{i}{2\hbar}\langle X\rangle\langle P\rangle}}{(\pi\ell^2)^{1/4}}e^{-\frac{(X-\langle X\rangle)^2}{2\ell^2}+\frac{i\langle P\rangle X}{\hbar}}<br />
with
<br /> \alpha=\langle a \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{\langle X\rangle}{\ell}+\frac{i\ell\langle P\rangle}{\hbar}\right)<br />

Homework Equations


<br /> a=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{X}{\ell}+\frac{i\ell P}{\hbar}\right)<br />
\ell=\sqrt{2}\Delta X


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so I think I have a game plan. Since a isn't Hermitian then its eigenvalues can be complex. So I should solve the eigenvalue problem for a|\alpha\rangle=\alpha|\alpha\rangle. But since I already showed that when the equality is valid in the Heisenberg inequality we get a gaussian like \psi(x) so if I can show that the eigenvalue problem admits a differential equation similar to what I already showed then that should be sufficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


naele said:
Ok, so I think I have a game plan. Since a isn't Hermitian then its eigenvalues can be complex. So I should solve the eigenvalue problem for a|\alpha\rangle=\alpha|\alpha\rangle. But since I already showed that when the equality is valid in the Heisenberg inequality we get a gaussian like \psi(x) so if I can show that the eigenvalue problem admits a differential equation similar to what I already showed then that should be sufficient?

The equations for the inequality involve expectation values, so you can't really draw too many conclusions about phases from them. The eigenvalue equation can be written as a differential equation though, and solving it should be easy since you're given the form of the solution.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top