I Unit Circle Confusion: A Self-Study Challenge?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter aronclark1017
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the use of trigonometric identities over the unit circle for solving problems, emphasizing that any point on the unit circle is defined by its coordinates (cos θ, sin θ). It explains that the negative y-axis corresponds to an angle of 3π/2, leading to the derivation of cos(3π/2 - x) = -sin x and sin(3π/2 - x) = -cos x. A participant points out a discrepancy in documentation claiming sin x = cos(3π/2 - x), noting it misses the negative sign. The conversation underscores the challenges faced by self-study students in verifying credible sources. Ultimately, the importance of careful examination of trigonometric identities and their derivations is emphasized.
aronclark1017
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
unit circle bug.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
People dont use the unit circle for these kinds of problems instead they use trig identities to reduce it.
 
Last edited:
aronclark1017 said:
Note that any point on the unit circle has coordinates ##(\cos \theta, \sin \theta)##. This is perhaps the simplest way to define sine and cosine in the first place.

The negative y-axis is at an angle of ##3\pi/2##. And the angle ##3\pi/2 - x## is an angle ##x## clockwise from the negative y-axis. From the geometry, the coordinates of that point are ##(-\sin x, -cos x)##. So that:
$$\cos(3\pi/2 - x) = -\sin x, \ \ \sin(3\pi/2 - x) = - \cos x$$
 
PeroK said:
Note that any point on the unit circle has coordinates ##(\cos \theta, \sin \theta)##. This is perhaps the simplest way to define sine and cosine in the first place.

The negative y-axis is at an angle of ##3\pi/2##. And the angle ##3\pi/2 - x## is an angle ##x## clockwise from the negative y-axis. From the geometry, the coordinates of that point are ##(-\sin x, -cos x)##. So that:
$$\cos(3\pi/2 - x) = -\sin x, \ \ \sin(3\pi/2 - x) = - \cos x$$
the following documentation is saying that sinx=cos(3pi/2-x). In all the former cases reflecting the triangle to come off of the Y axis as you see in 90-x derives the intended value but in this cases is not showing in the this documentation example. See..
Symmetric identities
If we draw a few copies of the triangle, we get:
$$\sin(x)=\cos(90-x)=-\cos(90+x)=\sin(180-x)=-\sin(180+x)=\cos(270-x)=-\cos(270+x)=-\sin(-x)$$
$$\cos(x)=\sin(90-x)=\sin(90+x)=-\cos(180-x)=-\cos(180+x)=\sin(270-x)=-\sin(270+x)=\cos(-x)$$
$$\tan(x)=\cot(90-x)=-\cot(90+x)=-\tan(180-x)=\tan(180+x)=\cot(270-x)=-\cot(270+x)=-\tan(-x)$$
The other three can be derived by taking the reciprocals of these three.

x is easier to type than theta

https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Proofs_of_trig_identities
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aronclark1017 said:
the following documentation is saying that sinx=cos(3pi/2-x).
Try with ##x = 30^\circ## and you'll see this is wrong.
 
yes it would appear to be missing the negative. But this documentation seems very creditable. I suppose it doesn't matter much as in this case of derivation of double angle formulas using unit circle.
unit circle double angle identities.webp
 
Last edited:
Sometimes credible things upon inspection are not so credible. This is the bane of self study students.